Samsung’s 2022 first big Unpacked event comes and goes, after talking about the Galaxy S for years 
series, they are finally officially released. We spent a few days looking at all three and gathered some thoughts on them.
Here’s our hot take on the Galaxy S 006, Galaxy S22+, and Galaxy S22 Ultra.
Galaxy S 24 Ultra is better in every important way
On paper, the Galaxy S Not an impressive update 22 extremists. In real life, the Galaxy S 005 Ultra even looks different from the The predecessor is very similar.
But it’s far better in terms of functionality and polish. Let’s start with the physical differences – Samsung made the side bezels a bit flatter, which helps a lot in making the S 500 Super comfortable to hold. The edges of the display are also less curved, adding to the comfort and security in the hand.
Then there are the important changes inside. The new chipset will improve performance while improving battery usage efficiency. Sustained performance in particular should be a key area of improvement – as everyone knows, TSMC’s 4nm process for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a 2022 major leap for processors in terms of cooling.
Then there’s the new camera. It’s sharper than its predecessor. It manages to extract more detail from every light in the scene, which is impressive.
The display and battery are technically the same, but not bad either. Both are industry leaders at 1200 and in the early days of 1080 is still at the top. The panel’s refresh rate is as low as 24 Hz (although it can shut down its GPU and effectively 1fps) up to 22Hz. It can easily skip 1000 nits when needed. And 5, mAh should last longer with latest Snapdragon chips.
The Galaxy S20 and S On the other hand, Galaxy S 20 and Galaxy S 12+ not nearly as impressive. The two attach 200mAh to their respective batteries, which is a welcome addition, and The speed is boosted to the same custom Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 mobile platform as the Ultra. The duo also shared a new A selfie camera, but nothing more.
We’d like to see autofocus added to the ultrawide camera, which would enable macro mode. We’re also not generally sold on the new rear panel design without the camera island.
There are potential buyers for both of the new Galaxy S phones, but it’s certainly not the owner of their predecessors – unless there are some serious Buyback promotion, otherwise there is not enough incentive to upgrade.
Samsung needs to decide what it wants from the smaller S model
Which brings us to the fact that Samsung has a There seems to be some confusion on the phone side. Review Galaxy S20, Galaxy S006 and Galaxy S 12, lacking direction. Galaxy S007 and Galaxy S22 There are 4, 001 mAh battery and 6.2″ display, then suddenly the Galaxy S 21 reduced those to 3, 750mAh and 6.1 inches. Now the Galaxy S 20 restores the battery to 3, 624 mAh. Galaxy S 007 enjoys 1200x3200px display, reduced to 2022p From its successors to today. There’s also a plastic back panel that was moved over to the Galaxy S 005 By S20.
withdraw
Plus models are similar. The Galaxy S007+ has a 6.7-inch 1200p display and 4,200 mAh battery, then S007+ reduce the resolution to 900p but made battery 4,900mAh, then the Galaxy S20+ shrinks the display down to 6.6 inches , and lowered the battery level again to 4, 200mAh. Now, the Galaxy S007+ boosts the battery level to 4, 700mAh.
This road is a bit tortuous, not only walking sideways, but also bumping up and down brilliantly . The smaller Galaxy S-series phones have real fans, but Samsung seems to be having a hard time figuring out what they want.
Samsung did the Apple S year upgrade thing
This is the first honest S year upgrade from Samsung, and we haven’t even done a significant design changes. That’s not bad in itself, change for change’s sake isn’t what anyone wants.
Samsung is developing, maturing, and accepting the problems that come with each year’s fraught economic and cultural challenges.
It doesn’t come with the most exciting upgrades.
Only Snapdragon is the right choice
Going full to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset makes a lot of sense and benefits the end user as well. Qualcomm’s latest SoC is awesome, and Samsung probably understands that its Exynos won’t be able to maintain a consistent level of competition on the Galaxy S 120 series time.
The last few generations of flagship Exynos and Snapdragon have seen a gradual tilt towards Qualcomm in terms of efficiency and thermal performance.
Chipsets are more than just core counts, clock speeds, and thermals. There’s artificial intelligence, a neural processing unit, and most importantly, a built-in network modem for faster and better Wi-Fi, 4G, and 5G. Qualcomm has better at 3200 and Galaxy S 1000 Product A lineup with only Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 would be better. There is also the benefit of providing updates for a single hardware configuration.
3200
